HasParametersIF less confusing
This commit is contained in:
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ ReturnValue_t DataPoolAdmin::handleParameterCommand(CommandMessage* command) {
|
||||
case ParameterMessage::CMD_PARAMETER_DUMP: {
|
||||
uint8_t domain = HasParametersIF::getDomain(
|
||||
ParameterMessage::getParameterId(command));
|
||||
uint16_t parameterId = HasParametersIF::getMatrixId(
|
||||
uint16_t parameterId = HasParametersIF::getUniqueIdentifierId(
|
||||
ParameterMessage::getParameterId(command));
|
||||
|
||||
DataPoolParameterWrapper wrapper;
|
||||
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ ReturnValue_t DataPoolAdmin::handleParameterCommand(CommandMessage* command) {
|
||||
|
||||
uint8_t domain = HasParametersIF::getDomain(
|
||||
ParameterMessage::getParameterId(command));
|
||||
uint16_t parameterId = HasParametersIF::getMatrixId(
|
||||
uint16_t parameterId = HasParametersIF::getUniqueIdentifierId(
|
||||
ParameterMessage::getParameterId(command));
|
||||
uint8_t index = HasParametersIF::getIndex(
|
||||
ParameterMessage::getParameterId(command));
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user