use new storage manager mock
This commit is contained in:
@ -37,10 +37,15 @@ ReturnValue_t StorageManagerMock::modifyData(store_address_t packet_id, uint8_t
|
||||
}
|
||||
return LocalPool::modifyData(packet_id, packet_ptr, size);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ReturnValue_t StorageManagerMock::getFreeElement(store_address_t *storageId, size_t size,
|
||||
uint8_t **p_data, bool ignoreFault) {
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (nextFreeElementCallFails.first) {
|
||||
return nextFreeElementCallFails.second;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return LocalPool::getFreeElement(storageId, size, p_data, ignoreFault);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool StorageManagerMock::hasDataAtId(store_address_t storeId) const {
|
||||
return LocalPool::hasDataAtId(storeId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -74,4 +79,11 @@ void StorageManagerMock::reset() {
|
||||
nextGetDataCallFails.second = result::OK;
|
||||
nextDeleteDataCallFails.first = false;
|
||||
nextDeleteDataCallFails.second = result::OK;
|
||||
nextFreeElementCallFails.first = false;
|
||||
nextFreeElementCallFails.second = result::OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
StorageManagerMock::StorageManagerMock(object_id_t setObjectId,
|
||||
const LocalPool::LocalPoolConfig &poolConfig)
|
||||
: LocalPool(setObjectId, poolConfig) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
class StorageManagerMock: public LocalPool {
|
||||
public:
|
||||
StorageManagerMock(object_id_t setObjectId, const LocalPoolConfig& poolConfig);
|
||||
|
||||
ReturnValue_t addData(store_address_t *storageId, const uint8_t *data, size_t size,
|
||||
bool ignoreFault) override;
|
||||
ReturnValue_t deleteData(store_address_t packet_id) override;
|
||||
@ -26,7 +28,7 @@ class StorageManagerMock: public LocalPool {
|
||||
std::pair<bool, ReturnValue_t> nextModifyDataCallFails;
|
||||
std::pair<bool, ReturnValue_t> nextGetDataCallFails;
|
||||
std::pair<bool, ReturnValue_t> nextDeleteDataCallFails;
|
||||
|
||||
std::pair<bool, ReturnValue_t> nextFreeElementCallFails;
|
||||
void reset();
|
||||
};
|
||||
#endif // FSFW_TESTS_STORAGEMANAGERMOCK_H
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user