this should fix the mmeory leak
This commit is contained in:
parent
6d00fc65c0
commit
c12669fe50
@ -209,9 +209,9 @@ ReturnValue_t LocalDataPoolManager::handleNotificationSnapshot(HkReceiver& recei
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Prepare and send update snapshot */
|
||||
timeval now;
|
||||
timeval now{};
|
||||
Clock::getClock_timeval(&now);
|
||||
CCSDSTime::CDS_short cds;
|
||||
CCSDSTime::CDS_short cds{};
|
||||
CCSDSTime::convertToCcsds(&cds, &now);
|
||||
HousekeepingSnapshot updatePacket(
|
||||
reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(&cds), sizeof(cds),
|
||||
@ -245,9 +245,9 @@ ReturnValue_t LocalDataPoolManager::handleNotificationSnapshot(HkReceiver& recei
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Prepare and send update snapshot */
|
||||
timeval now;
|
||||
timeval now{};
|
||||
Clock::getClock_timeval(&now);
|
||||
CCSDSTime::CDS_short cds;
|
||||
CCSDSTime::CDS_short cds{};
|
||||
CCSDSTime::convertToCcsds(&cds, &now);
|
||||
HousekeepingSnapshot updatePacket(
|
||||
reinterpret_cast<uint8_t*>(&cds), sizeof(cds),
|
||||
@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ ReturnValue_t LocalDataPoolManager::addUpdateToStore(HousekeepingSnapshot& updat
|
||||
|
||||
void LocalDataPoolManager::handleChangeResetLogic(DataType type, DataId dataId,
|
||||
MarkChangedIF* toReset) {
|
||||
HkUpdateResetList& listRef = hkUpdateResetList;
|
||||
for (auto& changeInfo : listRef) {
|
||||
for (auto& changeInfo : hkUpdateResetList) {
|
||||
if (changeInfo.dataType != type) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -19,12 +19,12 @@ ReturnValue_t LocalPoolOwnerBase::initializeHkManager() {
|
||||
ReturnValue_t LocalPoolOwnerBase::initializeLocalDataPool(localpool::DataPool &localDataPoolMap,
|
||||
LocalDataPoolManager &poolManager) {
|
||||
// Default initialization empty for now.
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::uint8VarId, new PoolEntry<uint8_t>({0}));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::floatVarId, new PoolEntry<float>({0}));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::uint32VarId, new PoolEntry<uint32_t>({0}));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::uint8VarId, &u8PoolEntry);
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::floatVarId, &floatPoolEntry);
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::uint32VarId, &u32PoolEntry);
|
||||
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::uint16Vec3Id, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>({0, 0, 0}));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::int64Vec2Id, new PoolEntry<int64_t>({0, 0}));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::uint16Vec3Id, &u16VecPoolEntry);
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(lpool::int64Vec2Id, &i64VecPoolEntry);
|
||||
return HasReturnvaluesIF::RETURN_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -7,10 +7,12 @@
|
||||
#include <fsfw/datapoollocal/LocalPoolVariable.h>
|
||||
#include <fsfw/datapoollocal/LocalPoolVector.h>
|
||||
#include <fsfw/datapoollocal/StaticLocalDataSet.h>
|
||||
#include "fsfw/datapool/PoolEntry.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#include <fsfw/ipc/QueueFactory.h>
|
||||
#include <fsfw/objectmanager/SystemObject.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include "../mocks/MessageQueueMock.h"
|
||||
#include "mocks/MessageQueueMock.h"
|
||||
#include "tests/TestsConfig.h"
|
||||
|
||||
namespace lpool {
|
||||
@ -164,10 +166,15 @@ class LocalPoolOwnerBase : public SystemObject, public HasLocalDataPoolIF {
|
||||
gp_id_t changedPoolVariableGpid;
|
||||
store_address_t storeIdForChangedVariable;
|
||||
|
||||
PoolEntry<uint8_t> u8PoolEntry = PoolEntry<uint8_t>({0});
|
||||
PoolEntry<float> floatPoolEntry = PoolEntry<float>({0});
|
||||
PoolEntry<uint32_t> u32PoolEntry = PoolEntry<uint32_t>({0});
|
||||
PoolEntry<uint16_t> u16VecPoolEntry = PoolEntry<uint16_t>({0, 0, 0});
|
||||
PoolEntry<int64_t> i64VecPoolEntry = PoolEntry<int64_t>({0, 0});
|
||||
|
||||
lp_var_t<uint8_t> testUint8 = lp_var_t<uint8_t>(this, lpool::uint8VarId);
|
||||
lp_var_t<float> testFloat = lp_var_t<float>(this, lpool::floatVarId);
|
||||
lp_var_t<uint32_t> testUint32 = lp_var_t<uint32_t>(this, lpool::uint32VarId);
|
||||
|
||||
lp_vec_t<uint16_t, 3> testUint16Vec = lp_vec_t<uint16_t, 3>(this, lpool::uint16Vec3Id);
|
||||
lp_vec_t<int64_t, 2> testInt64Vec = lp_vec_t<int64_t, 2>(this, lpool::int64Vec2Id);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user