Semaphore Initialization - Linux and FreeRTOS #89
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
API Change
Breaking API Change
bug
build
cosmetics
Documentation
duplicate
feature
help wanted
hotfix
invalid
question
Refactor
Tests
wontfix
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: fsfw/fsfw#89
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "KSat/fsfw:mueller_binSemaphoreInit"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Includes all new semaphore features.
Implemented for Linux and FreeRTOS.
fixes #53
Semaphore Initializationto Semaphore Initialization - Linux and FreeRTOSI tested this code with an internal unit tester (for linux and freeRTOS, and this test can also be used for rtems when the implementation is finished). I will add the code to the fsfw test repository.
UPDATE: interface will be adapted to be similar to new MutexIF interface.
Also, include replacements still missing
Semaphore Initialization - Linux and FreeRTOSto WIP: Semaphore Initialization - Linux and FreeRTOSWIP: Semaphore Initialization - Linux and FreeRTOSto Semaphore Initialization - Linux and FreeRTOS@ -0,0 +31,4 @@virtual~ SemaphoreIF() {};static const uint8_t INTERFACE_ID = CLASS_ID::SEMAPHORE_IF;I don't see the addition of the class id in FwClassIds. Could you add this change as well?
It's actually in there, I did a compile check
Interesting, I don't find it in the commit view.
Oh it's part of the master.