fsfw/fsfw
fsfw/fsfw
11
3
Fork 6
Code Issues 32 Pull Requests 4 Releases 10 Wiki Activity

Unittest integrated in FSFW now #242

Merged
gaisser merged 11 commits from KSat/fsfw:mueller/unittest-integration-from-master into master 2020-10-29 20:05:33 +01:00
Conversation 2 Commits 11 Files Changed 67 +4011 -2
muellerr commented 2020-10-20 17:15:18 +02:00
Owner
Copy Link

The unittest folder contains the Makefile-FSFW-Tests which needs to be copied into project main directory. It is assumed that the FSFW is included there as a submodule.

Then the unittests can be built (right now only on Linux)
with

make -f Makefile-FSFW-Tests -j

which generates a binary which can be run (run with --success for success messages).
README still needs to be updated. This propably makes fsfw_tests repo obsolete

The unittest folder contains the Makefile-FSFW-Tests which needs to be copied into project main directory. It is assumed that the FSFW is included there as a submodule. Then the unittests can be built (right now only on Linux) with ```sh make -f Makefile-FSFW-Tests -j ``` which generates a binary which can be run (run with --success for success messages). README still needs to be updated. This propably makes fsfw_tests repo obsolete
muellerr added the
feature
 label 2020-10-20 17:15:18 +02:00
gaisser commented 2020-10-27 12:14:36 +01:00
Owner
Copy Link

Ok, I have thought about this request. If we integrate catch2, we have to updated the licence and notice.
As this packet is publicly avaiable and not mandatory for the functionallity of the fsfw itself, we shouldn't integrate catch2 here.

Ok, I have thought about this request. If we integrate catch2, we have to updated the licence and notice. As this packet is publicly avaiable and not mandatory for the functionallity of the fsfw itself, we shouldn't integrate catch2 here.
gaisser added this to the Release Apollo-Sojus-Test-Project (ASTP) 0.0.1 milestone 2020-10-27 13:53:09 +01:00
muellerr commented 2020-10-27 14:10:23 +01:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Okay, we can do it like that but then we would keep fsfw_test I guess.

Okay, we can do it like that but then we would keep fsfw_test I guess.
gaisser merged commit 11a351a202 into master 2020-10-29 20:05:30 +01:00
gaisser deleted branch mueller/unittest-integration-from-master 2020-10-29 20:05:35 +01:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
Clear labels
API Change
Changes the API, so Users need to adapted
Breaking API Change
Changes the API in a non backwards compatible way
bug
Something is not working
build
Issues related to the buildsystem, including CI
cosmetics
Small change most users won't notice
Documentation
Improvement of code documentation
duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists
feature
New feature
help wanted
Need some help
hotfix
Quick or important fix that is merged directly into master, causing a new revision
invalid
#worksforme
question
More information is needed
Refactor
Contains a refactoring of some code
Tests
Issues related to testing code
wontfix
This won't be fixed
No Label
feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone Release Apollo-Sojus-Test-Project (ASTP) 0.0.1
Assignees
Clear assignees
ahinkel dwoodward gaisser hanke jenkins_buildfix lrajer meierj mohr muellerr taheran tbaumgartl
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: fsfw/fsfw#242
No description provided.
Delete Branch "KSat/fsfw:mueller/unittest-integration-from-master"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?