fixed bug with hk table reply size
This commit is contained in:
@ -188,12 +188,12 @@ ReturnValue_t ACUHandler::initializeLocalDataPool(
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_CURRENT_IN_CHANNEL4, new PoolEntry<int16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_CURRENT_IN_CHANNEL5, new PoolEntry<int16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_CURRENT_IN_CHANNEL0, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_CURRENT_IN_CHANNEL1, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_CURRENT_IN_CHANNEL2, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_CURRENT_IN_CHANNEL3, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_CURRENT_IN_CHANNEL4, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_CURRENT_IN_CHANNEL5, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_VOLTAGE_IN_CHANNEL0, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_VOLTAGE_IN_CHANNEL1, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_VOLTAGE_IN_CHANNEL2, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_VOLTAGE_IN_CHANNEL3, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_VOLTAGE_IN_CHANNEL4, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_VOLTAGE_IN_CHANNEL5, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_VCC, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
localDataPoolMap.emplace(P60System::ACU_VBAT, new PoolEntry<uint16_t>( { 0 }));
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user