important CFDP bugfix
All checks were successful
EIVE/eive-obsw/pipeline/head This commit looks good
All checks were successful
EIVE/eive-obsw/pipeline/head This commit looks good
This commit is contained in:
@ -53,16 +53,19 @@ ReturnValue_t CfdpTmFunnel::handlePacket(TmTcMessage& msg) {
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
size_t serSize = 0;
|
||||
size_t packetLen = 0;
|
||||
uint8_t* serPtr = newPacketData;
|
||||
result =
|
||||
spacePacketHeader.serializeBe(&newPacketData, &serSize, spacePacketHeader.getFullPacketLen());
|
||||
spacePacketHeader.serializeBe(&serPtr, &packetLen, spacePacketHeader.getFullPacketLen());
|
||||
if (result != returnvalue::OK) {
|
||||
#if FSFW_CPP_OSTREAM_ENABLED == 1
|
||||
sif::error << "CfdpTmFunnel::handlePacket: Error serializing packet" << std::endl;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
std::memcpy(newPacketData, cfdpPacket, cfdpPacketLen);
|
||||
std::memcpy(serPtr, cfdpPacket, cfdpPacketLen);
|
||||
packetLen += cfdpPacketLen;
|
||||
|
||||
// Delete old packet
|
||||
tmStore.deleteData(msg.getStorageId());
|
||||
msg.setStorageId(newStoreId);
|
||||
@ -74,13 +77,14 @@ ReturnValue_t CfdpTmFunnel::handlePacket(TmTcMessage& msg) {
|
||||
// Create copy of data to ensure each TM recipient has its own copy. That way, we don't need
|
||||
// to bother with send order and where the data is deleted.
|
||||
store_address_t storeId;
|
||||
result = tmStore.addData(&storeId, newPacketData, serSize);
|
||||
result = tmStore.addData(&storeId, newPacketData, packetLen);
|
||||
if (result == returnvalue::OK) {
|
||||
msg.setStorageId(storeId);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
#if FSFW_CPP_OSTREAM_ENABLED == 1
|
||||
sif::error << "PusTmFunnel::handlePacket: Store too full to create data copy"
|
||||
<< std::endl;
|
||||
sif::error << "PusTmFunnel::handlePacket: Store too full to create data copy or store "
|
||||
"error" << std::endl;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user