Updated FSFW to upstream development #5
@ -84,8 +84,6 @@ TEST_CASE("DataSetTest" , "[DataSetTest]") {
|
|||||||
CHECK(localSet.localPoolUint16Vec.getReadWriteMode() == pool_rwm_t::VAR_READ);
|
CHECK(localSet.localPoolUint16Vec.getReadWriteMode() == pool_rwm_t::VAR_READ);
|
||||||
CHECK(localSet.localPoolVarUint8.getReadWriteMode() == pool_rwm_t::VAR_READ);
|
CHECK(localSet.localPoolVarUint8.getReadWriteMode() == pool_rwm_t::VAR_READ);
|
||||||
CHECK(localSet.localPoolVarFloat.getReadWriteMode() == pool_rwm_t::VAR_READ);
|
CHECK(localSet.localPoolVarFloat.getReadWriteMode() == pool_rwm_t::VAR_READ);
|
||||||
/* For code coverage */
|
|
||||||
localSet.initializePeriodicHelper(0.0, 0.4, false);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
/* Now we read again and check whether our zeroed values were overwritten with
|
/* Now we read again and check whether our zeroed values were overwritten with
|
||||||
|
@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ TEST_CASE("LocalPoolManagerTest" , "[LocManTest]") {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
SECTION("BasicTest") {
|
SECTION("BasicTest") {
|
||||||
|
auto owner = poolOwner->poolManager.getOwner();
|
||||||
|
REQUIRE(owner != nullptr);
|
||||||
|
CHECK(owner->getObjectId() == objects::TEST_LOCAL_POOL_OWNER_BASE);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Subscribe for message generation on update. */
|
/* Subscribe for message generation on update. */
|
||||||
REQUIRE(poolOwner->subscribeWrapperSetUpdate() == retval::CATCH_OK);
|
REQUIRE(poolOwner->subscribeWrapperSetUpdate() == retval::CATCH_OK);
|
||||||
/* Subscribe for an update message. */
|
/* Subscribe for an update message. */
|
||||||
@ -190,6 +194,18 @@ TEST_CASE("LocalPoolManagerTest" , "[LocManTest]") {
|
|||||||
REQUIRE(mqMock->receiveMessage(&messageSent) == static_cast<int>(MessageQueueIF::EMPTY));
|
REQUIRE(mqMock->receiveMessage(&messageSent) == static_cast<int>(MessageQueueIF::EMPTY));
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SECTION("Periodic HK") {
|
||||||
|
/* Now we subcribe for a HK periodic generation. Even when it's difficult to simulate
|
||||||
|
the temporal behaviour correctly the HK manager should generate a HK packet
|
||||||
|
immediately and the periodic helper depends on HK op function calls anyway instead of
|
||||||
|
using the clock, so we could also just call performHkOperation multiple times */
|
||||||
|
REQUIRE(poolOwner->subscribePeriodicHk() == retval::CATCH_OK);
|
||||||
|
REQUIRE(poolOwner->poolManager.performHkOperation() == retval::CATCH_OK);
|
||||||
|
/* Now HK packet should be sent as message. */
|
||||||
|
REQUIRE(mqMock->wasMessageSent(&messagesSent) == true);
|
||||||
|
CHECK(messagesSent == 1);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* we need to reset the subscription list because the pool owner
|
/* we need to reset the subscription list because the pool owner
|
||||||
is a global object. */
|
is a global object. */
|
||||||
CHECK(poolOwner->reset() == retval::CATCH_OK);
|
CHECK(poolOwner->reset() == retval::CATCH_OK);
|
||||||
|
@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ public:
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
uint32_t getPeriodicOperationFrequency() const override {
|
uint32_t getPeriodicOperationFrequency() const override {
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0.2;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
@ -169,6 +169,10 @@ public:
|
|||||||
return dynamic_cast<MessageQueueMockBase*>(messageQueue);
|
return dynamic_cast<MessageQueueMockBase*>(messageQueue);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
ReturnValue_t subscribePeriodicHk() {
|
||||||
|
return poolManager.subscribeForPeriodicPacket(lpool::testSid, true, 0.2, false);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ReturnValue_t subscribeWrapperSetUpdate() {
|
ReturnValue_t subscribeWrapperSetUpdate() {
|
||||||
return poolManager.subscribeForSetUpdateMessage(lpool::testSetId,
|
return poolManager.subscribeForSetUpdateMessage(lpool::testSetId,
|
||||||
objects::NO_OBJECT, objects::HK_RECEIVER_MOCK, false);
|
objects::NO_OBJECT, objects::HK_RECEIVER_MOCK, false);
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user