Add a Task for executing DeviceHandlers in an equally spaced polling mode #17

Open
opened 2020-03-18 15:20:21 +01:00 by gaisser · 3 comments
Owner

Currently, a polling sequence is needed for DHB. If just a equally spaced execution of DHB steps is needed, then a simple Task in which you can at a DHB by its ObjectId should be added.

Currently, a polling sequence is needed for DHB. If just a equally spaced execution of DHB steps is needed, then a simple Task in which you can at a DHB by its ObjectId should be added.
taheran was assigned by gaisser 2020-03-18 15:20:21 +01:00
gaisser added the
feature
label 2020-03-18 15:20:21 +01:00
Member

I will work on the issue next week.

I will work on the issue next week.
Member

I wonder if we can still use the existing FixedSlotSequence to create an equally spaced TimeSlotTask to use with devices that do not share communication resources. If adding equally spaced slots for all device handlers in a sequence initialization function works, is there an advantage to have a specific DHtask for each device and add them to a multiobject task?

Sorry if I am missing something.

I wonder if we can still use the existing FixedSlotSequence to create an equally spaced TimeSlotTask to use with devices that do not share communication resources. If adding equally spaced slots for all device handlers in a sequence initialization function works, is there an advantage to have a specific DHtask for each device and add them to a multiobject task? Sorry if I am missing something.
Owner

This is interesting for EIVE as well. What would be the best way to implement this? Regular Task or Fixed Timeslots but only the need to insert the device handler via helper inserter?

What about the DHB being able to execute all 4 COM steps consecutively via a special mode member?

This is interesting for EIVE as well. What would be the best way to implement this? Regular Task or Fixed Timeslots but only the need to insert the device handler via helper inserter? What about the DHB being able to execute all 4 COM steps consecutively via a special mode member?
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: fsfw/fsfw#17
No description provided.