Bug in SerialArrayListAdapter #33

Closed
opened 2020-04-15 13:25:19 +02:00 by muellerr · 2 comments
Owner

Returnvalue of first deSerialize call is not checked. Is this intended?

Returnvalue of first deSerialize call is not checked. Is this intended?
muellerr changed title from bug in SerialArrayListAdapter to (maybe) bug in SerialArrayListAdapter 2020-04-15 13:28:30 +02:00
gaisser added the
bug
label 2020-04-16 14:27:57 +02:00
gaisser added
invalid
and removed
bug
labels 2020-04-16 14:32:42 +02:00
Owner

Ah the while loop will check the return value in first cycle. But he list->size is manipulated before the check.

Ah the while loop will check the return value in first cycle. But he list->size is manipulated before the check.
gaisser added
bug
and removed
invalid
labels 2020-04-16 14:33:36 +02:00
gaisser changed title from (maybe) bug in SerialArrayListAdapter to Bug in SerialArrayListAdapter 2020-04-16 14:35:48 +02:00
Author
Owner

i'll check this again as soon as SerializeIF changes have been integrated.

i'll check this again as soon as SerializeIF changes have been integrated.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: fsfw/fsfw#33
No description provided.