rust/sat-rs
6
1
Fork 0
Code Issues 9 Pull Requests Projects Releases 24 Wiki Activity

this makes a bit more sense
All checks were successful
Rust/sat-rs/pipeline/head This commit looks good
Details

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Robin Müller
2024-04-10 15:19:08 +02:00
parent d43a8eb571
commit f96fe6bdc0
2 changed files with 29 additions and 29 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

28
satrs-example/src/pus/action.rs
View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ use satrs::action::{ActionRequest, ActionRequestVariant};
use satrs::params::WritableToBeBytes;
use satrs::pool::SharedStaticMemoryPool;
use satrs::pus::action::{
ActionReplyVariant, ActivePusActionRequestStd, DefaultActiveActionRequestMap, PusActionReply,
ActionReplyPus, ActionReplyVariant, ActivePusActionRequestStd, DefaultActiveActionRequestMap,
};
use satrs::pus::verification::{
FailParams, FailParamsWithStep, TcStateAccepted, TcStateStarted, VerificationReporter,
@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ impl Default for ActionReplyHandler {
}
}
impl PusReplyHandler<ActivePusActionRequestStd, PusActionReply> for ActionReplyHandler {
impl PusReplyHandler<ActivePusActionRequestStd, ActionReplyPus> for ActionReplyHandler {
type Error = EcssTmtcError;
fn handle_unrequested_reply(
&mut self,
reply: &GenericMessage<PusActionReply>,
reply: &GenericMessage<ActionReplyPus>,
_tm_sender: &impl EcssTmSenderCore,
) -> Result<(), Self::Error> {
warn!("received unexpected reply for service 8: {reply:?}");
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ impl PusReplyHandler<ActivePusActionRequestStd, PusActionReply> for ActionReplyH
fn handle_reply(
&mut self,
reply: &GenericMessage<PusActionReply>,
reply: &GenericMessage<ActionReplyPus>,
active_request: &ActivePusActionRequestStd,
tm_sender: &(impl EcssTmSenderCore + ?Sized),
verification_handler: &impl VerificationReportingProvider,
@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ pub fn create_action_service_static(
tc_pool: SharedStaticMemoryPool,
pus_action_rx: mpsc::Receiver<EcssTcAndToken>,
action_router: GenericRequestRouter,
reply_receiver: mpsc::Receiver<GenericMessage<PusActionReply>>,
reply_receiver: mpsc::Receiver<GenericMessage<ActionReplyPus>>,
) -> ActionServiceWrapper<MpscTmInSharedPoolSenderBounded, EcssTcInSharedStoreConverter> {
let action_request_handler = PusTargetedRequestService::new(
PusServiceHelper::new(
@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ pub fn create_action_service_dynamic(
tm_funnel_tx: mpsc::Sender<PusTmAsVec>,
pus_action_rx: mpsc::Receiver<EcssTcAndToken>,
action_router: GenericRequestRouter,
reply_receiver: mpsc::Receiver<GenericMessage<PusActionReply>>,
reply_receiver: mpsc::Receiver<GenericMessage<ActionReplyPus>>,
) -> ActionServiceWrapper<MpscTmAsVecSender, EcssTcInVecConverter> {
let action_request_handler = PusTargetedRequestService::new(
PusServiceHelper::new(
@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ pub struct ActionServiceWrapper<TmSender: EcssTmSenderCore, TcInMemConverter: Ec
DefaultActiveActionRequestMap,
ActivePusActionRequestStd,
ActionRequest,
PusActionReply,
ActionReplyPus,
>,
}
@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ mod tests {
DefaultActiveActionRequestMap,
ActivePusActionRequestStd,
ActionRequest,
PusActionReply,
ActionReplyPus,
>
{
pub fn new_for_action(owner_id: ComponentId, target_id: ComponentId) -> Self {
@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ mod tests {
if let CompositeRequest::Action(action_req) = req.message {
assert_eq!(action_req.action_id, action_id);
assert_eq!(action_req.variant, ActionRequestVariant::NoData);
let action_reply = PusActionReply::new(action_id, ActionReplyVariant::Completed);
let action_reply = ActionReplyPus::new(action_id, ActionReplyVariant::Completed);
testbench
.reply_tx
.send(GenericMessage::new(req.requestor_info, action_reply))
@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ mod tests {
let (req_id, active_req) = testbench.add_tc(TEST_APID, TEST_UNIQUE_ID_0, &[]);
let active_action_req =
ActivePusActionRequestStd::new_from_common_req(action_id, active_req);
let reply = PusActionReply::new(action_id, ActionReplyVariant::Completed);
let reply = ActionReplyPus::new(action_id, ActionReplyVariant::Completed);
let generic_reply = GenericMessage::new(MessageMetadata::new(req_id.into(), 0), reply);
let result = testbench.handle_reply(&generic_reply, &active_action_req, &[]);
assert!(result.is_ok());
@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ mod tests {
let active_action_req =
ActivePusActionRequestStd::new_from_common_req(action_id, active_req);
let error_code = ResultU16::new(2, 3);
let reply = PusActionReply::new(
let reply = ActionReplyPus::new(
action_id,
ActionReplyVariant::CompletionFailed {
error_code,
@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ mod tests {
let (req_id, active_req) = testbench.add_tc(TEST_APID, TEST_UNIQUE_ID_0, &[]);
let active_action_req =
ActivePusActionRequestStd::new_from_common_req(action_id, active_req);
let reply = PusActionReply::new(action_id, ActionReplyVariant::StepSuccess { step: 1 });
let reply = ActionReplyPus::new(action_id, ActionReplyVariant::StepSuccess { step: 1 });
let generic_reply = GenericMessage::new(MessageMetadata::new(req_id.into(), 0), reply);
let result = testbench.handle_reply(&generic_reply, &active_action_req, &[]);
assert!(result.is_ok());
@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ mod tests {
let active_action_req =
ActivePusActionRequestStd::new_from_common_req(action_id, active_req);
let error_code = ResultU16::new(2, 3);
let reply = PusActionReply::new(
let reply = ActionReplyPus::new(
action_id,
ActionReplyVariant::StepFailed {
error_code,
@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ mod tests {
fn reply_handling_unrequested_reply() {
let mut testbench =
ReplyHandlerTestbench::new(TEST_COMPONENT_ID_0.id(), ActionReplyHandler::default());
let action_reply = PusActionReply::new(5_u32, ActionReplyVariant::Completed);
let action_reply = ActionReplyPus::new(5_u32, ActionReplyVariant::Completed);
let unrequested_reply =
GenericMessage::new(MessageMetadata::new(10_u32, 15_u64), action_reply);
// Right now this function does not do a lot. We simply check that it does not panic or do