Merge branch 'mueller/thermal-handler' into mueller/master
This commit is contained in:
commit
1cceda8e63
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
#ifndef TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_
|
||||
#define TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_
|
||||
#ifndef FSFW_THERMAL_TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_
|
||||
#define FSFW_THERMAL_TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_
|
||||
|
||||
#include "tcsDefinitions.h"
|
||||
#include "AbstractTemperatureSensor.h"
|
||||
@ -61,22 +61,21 @@ public:
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Instantiate Temperature Sensor Object.
|
||||
* @param setObjectid objectId of the sensor object
|
||||
* @param inputValue Pointer to input value which is converted to a temperature
|
||||
* @param variableGpid Global Pool ID of the output value
|
||||
* @param inputVariable Input variable handle
|
||||
* @param inputTemperature Pointer to a raw input value which is converted to an floating
|
||||
* point C output temperature
|
||||
* @param outputGpid Global Pool ID of the output value
|
||||
* @param vectorIndex Vector Index for the sensor monitor
|
||||
* @param parameters Calculation parameters, temperature limits, gradient limit
|
||||
* @param outputSet Output dataset for the output temperature to fetch it with read()
|
||||
* @param thermalModule respective thermal module, if it has one
|
||||
* @param thermalModule Respective thermal module, if it has one
|
||||
*/
|
||||
TemperatureSensor(object_id_t setObjectid,
|
||||
inputType *inputValue, gp_id_t variableGpid, PoolVariableIF* inputVariable,
|
||||
uint8_t vectorIndex, Parameters parameters = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
|
||||
LocalPoolDataSetBase *outputSet = NULL, ThermalModuleIF *thermalModule = NULL) :
|
||||
TemperatureSensor(object_id_t setObjectid,lp_var_t<limitType>* inputTemperature,
|
||||
gp_id_t outputGpid, uint8_t vectorIndex, Parameters parameters = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
|
||||
LocalPoolDataSetBase *outputSet = nullptr, ThermalModuleIF *thermalModule = nullptr) :
|
||||
AbstractTemperatureSensor(setObjectid, thermalModule), parameters(parameters),
|
||||
inputValue(inputValue), poolVariable(inputVariable),
|
||||
outputTemperature(variableGpid, outputSet, PoolVariableIF::VAR_WRITE),
|
||||
sensorMonitor(setObjectid, DOMAIN_ID_SENSOR, poolVariable,
|
||||
inputTemperature(inputTemperature),
|
||||
outputTemperature(outputGpid, outputSet, PoolVariableIF::VAR_WRITE),
|
||||
sensorMonitor(setObjectid, DOMAIN_ID_SENSOR, outputGpid,
|
||||
DEFAULT_CONFIRMATION_COUNT, parameters.lowerLimit, parameters.upperLimit,
|
||||
TEMP_SENSOR_LOW, TEMP_SENSOR_HIGH),
|
||||
oldTemperature(20), uptimeOfOldTemperature({ thermal::INVALID_TEMPERATURE, 0 }) {
|
||||
@ -110,10 +109,7 @@ protected:
|
||||
|
||||
UsedParameters parameters;
|
||||
|
||||
inputType* inputValue;
|
||||
|
||||
PoolVariableIF* poolVariable;
|
||||
|
||||
lp_var_t<limitType>* inputTemperature;
|
||||
lp_var_t<float> outputTemperature;
|
||||
|
||||
LimitMonitor<limitType> sensorMonitor;
|
||||
@ -122,22 +118,27 @@ protected:
|
||||
timeval uptimeOfOldTemperature;
|
||||
|
||||
void doChildOperation() {
|
||||
if ((not poolVariable->isValid()) or
|
||||
ReturnValue_t result = inputTemperature->read(MutexIF::TimeoutType::WAITING, 20);
|
||||
if(result != HasReturnvaluesIF::RETURN_OK) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((not inputTemperature->isValid()) or
|
||||
(not healthHelper.healthTable->isHealthy(getObjectId()))) {
|
||||
setInvalid();
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
outputTemperature = calculateOutputTemperature(*inputValue);
|
||||
outputTemperature = calculateOutputTemperature(inputTemperature->value);
|
||||
outputTemperature.setValid(PoolVariableIF::VALID);
|
||||
|
||||
timeval uptime;
|
||||
Clock::getUptime(&uptime);
|
||||
|
||||
if (uptimeOfOldTemperature.tv_sec != INVALID_UPTIME) {
|
||||
//In theory, we could use an AbsValueMonitor to monitor the gradient.
|
||||
//But this would require storing the maxGradient in DP and quite some overhead.
|
||||
//The concept of delta limits is a bit strange anyway.
|
||||
// In theory, we could use an AbsValueMonitor to monitor the gradient.
|
||||
// But this would require storing the maxGradient in DP and quite some overhead.
|
||||
// The concept of delta limits is a bit strange anyway.
|
||||
float deltaTime;
|
||||
float deltaTemp;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -150,11 +151,11 @@ protected:
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (parameters.gradient < deltaTemp / deltaTime) {
|
||||
triggerEvent(TEMP_SENSOR_GRADIENT);
|
||||
//Don't set invalid, as we did not recognize it as invalid with full authority, let FDIR handle it
|
||||
// Don't set invalid, as we did not recognize it as invalid with full authority,
|
||||
// let FDIR handle it
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
//Check is done against raw limits. SHOULDDO: Why? Using C would be more easy to handle.
|
||||
sensorMonitor.doCheck(outputTemperature.value);
|
||||
|
||||
if (sensorMonitor.isOutOfLimits()) {
|
||||
@ -181,7 +182,10 @@ public:
|
||||
static const uint16_t ADDRESS_C = 2;
|
||||
static const uint16_t ADDRESS_GRADIENT = 3;
|
||||
|
||||
static const uint16_t DEFAULT_CONFIRMATION_COUNT = 1; //!< Changed due to issue with later temperature checking even tough the sensor monitor was confirming already (Was 10 before with comment = Correlates to a 10s confirmation time. Chosen rather large, should not be so bad for components and helps survive glitches.)
|
||||
//! Changed due to issue with later temperature checking even tough the sensor monitor was
|
||||
//! confirming already (Was 10 before with comment = Correlates to a 10s confirmation time.
|
||||
//! Chosen rather large, should not be so bad for components and helps survive glitches.)
|
||||
static const uint16_t DEFAULT_CONFIRMATION_COUNT = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
static const uint8_t DOMAIN_ID_SENSOR = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -221,4 +225,4 @@ public:
|
||||
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_ */
|
||||
#endif /* FSFW_THERMAL_TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_ */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user