If the base function is used instead, events will get triggered during recoveries which might break stuff.
Is this function not called or why remove it?
If the base function is used instead, events will get triggered during recoveries which might break stuff.
I don't know for sure. what will happen if another event is triggered during recoveries. For now it seems ok as the FDIR does not react. Although, higher level FDIRs will react if the system has any.
I don't know for sure. what will happen if another event is triggered during recoveries. For now it seems ok as the FDIR does not react. Although, higher level FDIRs will react if the system has any.
I think this should be fine.. isn't is a configuration error if a device throws tons of unexpected events for reboot handling or when being faulty? I tested this for EIVE and did not receive any unexpected event spam so far.
I think this should be fine.. isn't is a configuration error if a device throws tons of unexpected events for reboot handling or when being faulty? I tested this for EIVE and did not receive any unexpected event spam so far.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Please check if it is ok to trigger events during fdirState == NONE.
@@ -186,15 +191,6 @@ void DeviceHandlerFailureIsolation::setFdirState(FDIRState state) {fdirState = state;}void DeviceHandlerFailureIsolation::triggerEvent(Event event, uint32_t parameter1,Is this function not called or why remove it?
If the base function is used instead, events will get triggered during recoveries which might break stuff.
Aren't FDIR reactions ignored if the FDIR is active? Also, aren't there cases where I'd at least want to see the events even if the FDIR is active?
I don't know for sure. what will happen if another event is triggered during recoveries. For now it seems ok as the FDIR does not react. Although, higher level FDIRs will react if the system has any.
Have you watched any events during testing while in recovery? it might filter event spam.
I think this should be fine.. isn't is a configuration error if a device throws tons of unexpected events for reboot handling or when being faulty? I tested this for EIVE and did not receive any unexpected event spam so far.
You mean events with severity higher than INFO while the FDIR is IDLE? This was already tested.