Merge branch 'mueller/thermal-handler' into mueller/master

This commit is contained in:
Robin Müller 2021-04-20 15:59:44 +02:00
commit 1cceda8e63
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 71B58F8A3CDFA9AC

View File

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#ifndef TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_
#define TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_
#ifndef FSFW_THERMAL_TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_
#define FSFW_THERMAL_TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_
#include "tcsDefinitions.h"
#include "AbstractTemperatureSensor.h"
@ -61,22 +61,21 @@ public:
/**
* Instantiate Temperature Sensor Object.
* @param setObjectid objectId of the sensor object
* @param inputValue Pointer to input value which is converted to a temperature
* @param variableGpid Global Pool ID of the output value
* @param inputVariable Input variable handle
* @param inputTemperature Pointer to a raw input value which is converted to an floating
* point C output temperature
* @param outputGpid Global Pool ID of the output value
* @param vectorIndex Vector Index for the sensor monitor
* @param parameters Calculation parameters, temperature limits, gradient limit
* @param outputSet Output dataset for the output temperature to fetch it with read()
* @param thermalModule respective thermal module, if it has one
* @param thermalModule Respective thermal module, if it has one
*/
TemperatureSensor(object_id_t setObjectid,
inputType *inputValue, gp_id_t variableGpid, PoolVariableIF* inputVariable,
uint8_t vectorIndex, Parameters parameters = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
LocalPoolDataSetBase *outputSet = NULL, ThermalModuleIF *thermalModule = NULL) :
TemperatureSensor(object_id_t setObjectid,lp_var_t<limitType>* inputTemperature,
gp_id_t outputGpid, uint8_t vectorIndex, Parameters parameters = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0},
LocalPoolDataSetBase *outputSet = nullptr, ThermalModuleIF *thermalModule = nullptr) :
AbstractTemperatureSensor(setObjectid, thermalModule), parameters(parameters),
inputValue(inputValue), poolVariable(inputVariable),
outputTemperature(variableGpid, outputSet, PoolVariableIF::VAR_WRITE),
sensorMonitor(setObjectid, DOMAIN_ID_SENSOR, poolVariable,
inputTemperature(inputTemperature),
outputTemperature(outputGpid, outputSet, PoolVariableIF::VAR_WRITE),
sensorMonitor(setObjectid, DOMAIN_ID_SENSOR, outputGpid,
DEFAULT_CONFIRMATION_COUNT, parameters.lowerLimit, parameters.upperLimit,
TEMP_SENSOR_LOW, TEMP_SENSOR_HIGH),
oldTemperature(20), uptimeOfOldTemperature({ thermal::INVALID_TEMPERATURE, 0 }) {
@ -110,10 +109,7 @@ protected:
UsedParameters parameters;
inputType* inputValue;
PoolVariableIF* poolVariable;
lp_var_t<limitType>* inputTemperature;
lp_var_t<float> outputTemperature;
LimitMonitor<limitType> sensorMonitor;
@ -122,22 +118,27 @@ protected:
timeval uptimeOfOldTemperature;
void doChildOperation() {
if ((not poolVariable->isValid()) or
ReturnValue_t result = inputTemperature->read(MutexIF::TimeoutType::WAITING, 20);
if(result != HasReturnvaluesIF::RETURN_OK) {
return;
}
if ((not inputTemperature->isValid()) or
(not healthHelper.healthTable->isHealthy(getObjectId()))) {
setInvalid();
return;
}
outputTemperature = calculateOutputTemperature(*inputValue);
outputTemperature = calculateOutputTemperature(inputTemperature->value);
outputTemperature.setValid(PoolVariableIF::VALID);
timeval uptime;
Clock::getUptime(&uptime);
if (uptimeOfOldTemperature.tv_sec != INVALID_UPTIME) {
//In theory, we could use an AbsValueMonitor to monitor the gradient.
//But this would require storing the maxGradient in DP and quite some overhead.
//The concept of delta limits is a bit strange anyway.
// In theory, we could use an AbsValueMonitor to monitor the gradient.
// But this would require storing the maxGradient in DP and quite some overhead.
// The concept of delta limits is a bit strange anyway.
float deltaTime;
float deltaTemp;
@ -150,11 +151,11 @@ protected:
}
if (parameters.gradient < deltaTemp / deltaTime) {
triggerEvent(TEMP_SENSOR_GRADIENT);
//Don't set invalid, as we did not recognize it as invalid with full authority, let FDIR handle it
// Don't set invalid, as we did not recognize it as invalid with full authority,
// let FDIR handle it
}
}
//Check is done against raw limits. SHOULDDO: Why? Using C would be more easy to handle.
sensorMonitor.doCheck(outputTemperature.value);
if (sensorMonitor.isOutOfLimits()) {
@ -181,7 +182,10 @@ public:
static const uint16_t ADDRESS_C = 2;
static const uint16_t ADDRESS_GRADIENT = 3;
static const uint16_t DEFAULT_CONFIRMATION_COUNT = 1; //!< Changed due to issue with later temperature checking even tough the sensor monitor was confirming already (Was 10 before with comment = Correlates to a 10s confirmation time. Chosen rather large, should not be so bad for components and helps survive glitches.)
//! Changed due to issue with later temperature checking even tough the sensor monitor was
//! confirming already (Was 10 before with comment = Correlates to a 10s confirmation time.
//! Chosen rather large, should not be so bad for components and helps survive glitches.)
static const uint16_t DEFAULT_CONFIRMATION_COUNT = 1;
static const uint8_t DOMAIN_ID_SENSOR = 1;
@ -221,4 +225,4 @@ public:
};
#endif /* TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_ */
#endif /* FSFW_THERMAL_TEMPERATURESENSOR_H_ */