New StoreAccessors and separation of implementation for storagemanager classes #92

muellerr · 2020-05-29T16:52:37+02:00

muellerr commented

2020-05-29 16:52:37 +02:00

Implements changes from #66 but also introduces new StoreAccessor classes.

It propably would be a good idea to merge #66 first. It should be possible to merge them consecutively without merge conflicts, but if this pull request is merged, #66 should be deleted (this request includes ##66)

I also improved the include guards for the implementation (.tpp) files.

To enable syntax highlighting for the .tpp files follow these steps:

Also includes some ObjectManagerIF #73 changes: new returnvalues for failed initializations, a nullptr check for the get function and improved include to allow for multiple configurations

Implements changes from #66 but also introduces new StoreAccessor classes. It propably would be a good idea to merge #66 first. It should be possible to merge them consecutively without merge conflicts, but if this pull request is merged, #66 should be deleted (this request includes ##66) I also improved the include guards for the implementation (.tpp) files. To enable syntax highlighting for the .tpp files follow [these](https://blog.roland-speith.de/?p=1066) steps: Also includes some ObjectManagerIF #73 changes: new returnvalues for failed initializations, a nullptr check for the get function and improved include to allow for multiple configurations

muellerr changed title from ~~New StoreAccessors and seperation of implementation for storagemanager classes~~ to New StoreAccessors and separation of implementation for storagemanager classes

2020-05-29 16:52:44 +02:00

muellerr added the

feature

label 2020-05-29 16:52:49 +02:00

muellerr commented

2020-07-06 12:51:55 +02:00

Fixes #68 and fixes #74 . #66 was merged now.