New StoreAccessors and separation of implementation for storagemanager classes #92
Implements changes from #66 but also introduces new StoreAccessor classes.
It propably would be a good idea to merge #66 first. It should be possible to merge them consecutively without merge conflicts, but if this pull request is merged, #66 should be deleted (this request includes ##66)
I also improved the include guards for the implementation (.tpp) files.
To enable syntax highlighting for the .tpp files follow these steps:
Also includes some ObjectManagerIF #73 changes: new returnvalues for failed initializations, a nullptr check for the get function and improved include to allow for multiple configurations
No due date set.
No dependencies set.
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?